Consumer electronics lack any EMP resilience rating or labeling standard

There is no consumer-facing rating, label, or standard that indicates how resilient a device — phone, laptop, router, car ECU — is to electromagnetic pulse events. UL, FCC, and CE certifications test for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) to prevent devices from interfering with each other, but they do not test for survivability under the intense field strengths of an EMP (50 kV/m for HEMP E1, compared to the millivolts-per-meter range of EMC testing). This means consumers, businesses, hospitals, and local governments have zero ability to make informed purchasing decisions about EMP resilience. A hospital cannot specify "EMP-rated" ventilators. A city cannot procure "EMP-rated" traffic control systems. When people buy Faraday bags or "EMP-proof" enclosures on Amazon, there is no standard to verify the manufacturer's claims — most are untested marketing. The structural reason is that EMP resilience testing is destructive and expensive. You cannot test a $1,200 phone for EMP survivability without destroying it, and manufacturers have no market incentive to invest in a rating for an event most consumers do not consider. Standards bodies like IEEE focus on military specs (MIL-STD-188-125) that are classified or export-controlled, making civilian adoption impossible.