85% of DV shelters reject pets, trapping 48% of survivors

safety0 views
Up to 89% of pet-owning women entering DV shelters report that their abuser injured, killed, or threatened family pets as a control tactic. Yet only about 15% of domestic violence shelters in the US accept companion animals. The consequence: between 18-48% of survivors either delay leaving or return to the abuser specifically because they fear what will happen to their pet. This is not a sentimental nicety — abusers deliberately target pets as leverage, knowing the survivor will not leave without them. When a survivor does leave without the pet, the abuser uses the animal as a continued coercive control tool (threatening harm to force contact, using the pet to lure the survivor back). Survivors who abandon pets also experience compounding guilt and trauma that worsens PTSD outcomes. This persists structurally because DV shelter funding (primarily FVPSA federal grants) does not earmark money for animal housing, shelters face liability and health code concerns with animals on-site, and the few pet-safe shelter programs (like RedRover Relief) are grant-dependent and cannot scale.

Evidence

ASPCA policy brief on pet-friendly DV housing: https://www.aspca.org/improving-laws-animals/public-policy/housing/pet-friendly-housing-and-survivors-domestic-violence. RedRover reports 48% of survivors delayed leaving due to pet concerns (https://redrover.org/domestic-violence-and-pets/). National Hotline survey: 97% of respondents said keeping pets was important to shelter-seeking; 50% would not consider shelter without their pet (https://www.thehotline.org/news/pets-are-critical-priority-for-survivors-seeking-safety/). Up to 89% of pet-owning women in shelters reported animal abuse by partner (DVSN, https://www.dvsn.org/november-2024-pet-abuse-and-the-link-to-domestic-violence/).

Comments

85% of DV shelters reject pets, trapping 48% of survivors | Remaining Problems