Wildfire suppression spending cannibalized 50%+ of Forest Service non-fire budget for decades

public-safety0 views
Wildfire suppression costs exceeded congressional appropriations almost every year from 1990 to 2018. When suppression funds ran out mid-fire-season, the Forest Service transferred money from other programs: trail maintenance, timber management, watershed restoration, and the very fuel reduction projects that would prevent future fires. This created a doom loop: borrowing from prevention to pay for suppression meant more fuel accumulated, which produced worse fires, which cost more to suppress, which required more borrowing from prevention. By the mid-2010s, fire spending consumed over 50% of the Forest Service's total budget, up from 16% in 1995. Congress passed a partial fix in 2018 creating a Wildfire Suppression Operations Reserve Fund, but the fund balance was only $670M as of FY2023, while individual fire seasons routinely exceed $3B. The structural cause is that Congress appropriates suppression budgets based on 10-year rolling averages, but climate change is making each decade worse than the last, so the average always underpredicts actual costs.

Evidence

Suppression costs exceeded appropriations almost every year since 1990 (GAO-04-612). Fire spending consumed 50%+ of Forest Service budget vs 16% in 1995. The 2018 omnibus created a reserve fund starting at $2.25B in FY2020, rising $100M/year to $2.95B by FY2027. Reserve fund balance was $670M as of FY2023. FY2024 combined total was $6.352B regular + $670M emergency supplemental. Sources: NIFC Suppression Costs data, GAO, Taxpayers for Common Sense 'Clearing the Smoke' report (2023), CBO, CRS IF12398.

Comments