HOA management companies take undisclosed kickbacks from vendors they hire
housing+2housingconsumerlegal0 views
HOA management companies routinely receive undisclosed commissions, referral fees, and kickbacks from the vendors they recommend and hire on behalf of the association. A management company selects the landscaper, the roofer, the insurance broker, and the elevator maintenance firm — and collects 10-20% of every contract as a referral fee that never appears in any HOA financial statement.
This matters because homeowners are paying inflated prices for every service their community receives. A $50,000 roof repair might cost $42,000 from a different contractor, but the management company steers the work to the vendor who kicks back the most. Multiply this across landscaping, insurance, legal, painting, plumbing, and pest control contracts and an average HOA overpays by $15,000-$40,000 per year. That money comes directly out of homeowner dues.
The deeper pain is that homeowners have almost no way to detect this. The management company controls the bid process, presents only pre-selected vendors to the board, and buries referral arrangements in side agreements that aren't part of the HOA's books. Board members are volunteers with no procurement training, so they trust the management company's recommendations. Even if a homeowner suspects something, they'd need to file a lawsuit and subpoena the management company's vendor contracts to prove it.
This persists because there is no federal regulation of HOA management companies and only a handful of states (Nevada, Florida, Illinois) require any licensing or disclosure of vendor relationships. The Community Associations Institute publishes voluntary ethical standards, but compliance is self-reported and unaudited. Management companies have a structural incentive to maintain opacity because kickbacks often exceed their stated management fees as a revenue source.
In the first place, the HOA governance model concentrates enormous purchasing power in the hands of a management company that has fiduciary duties to the association on paper but faces zero enforcement of those duties in practice. There is no HOA equivalent of a public company's audit committee or SEC oversight.
Evidence
A 2019 Cedar Management Group lawsuit in Colorado revealed the company received $1.2M in undisclosed vendor kickbacks over 4 years (https://www.denverpost.com/2019/07/15/colorado-hoa-management-company-kickbacks/). The Foundation for Community Association Research estimates that 370,000 HOAs in the U.S. spend over $100 billion annually on services, making vendor kickbacks a multi-billion dollar hidden cost. Nevada's NRS 116.31155 is one of the few state laws requiring disclosure of management company vendor compensation, passed only after widespread fraud complaints. A 2022 University of Illinois study found that HOAs using management companies paid 18% more for equivalent services compared to self-managed associations.