Ankle monitors cost wearers $10-$35/day out of pocket, and a dead battery is a jailable violation even if you never left your house

legal0 views
Electronic ankle monitors — GPS, RF, and SCRAM devices — are marketed as humane alternatives to incarceration, but in 49 states (every state except Hawaii), the person wearing the monitor must pay for it. GPS monitoring costs $10-$35/day, SCRAM alcohol monitors cost $10-$40/day, with setup fees of $50-$300 on top. That is $300-$1,050 per month coming out of the pocket of someone who was too poor to post bail in the first place. In one documented Alabama case, a man was incarcerated for 12 months for stealing a single beer because he could not afford the $10/day monitor fee. In another case, ankle monitor payments consumed $520 of a person's monthly Social Security benefits. The technical problems compound the financial ones. If the battery dies because you could not charge it during a 10-hour warehouse shift, that is a jailable violation — even if you were at an approved location the entire time. GPS signals drop inside large buildings, triggering false alerts. A National Institute of Justice study found that 22% of people wearing ankle monitors were fired or asked to leave their jobs because of the devices — they had to take breaks to walk outside and reconnect lost signals, or employers simply did not want the liability. So the device that is supposed to keep you out of jail costs you the job you need to pay for the device, and when you cannot pay, you go to jail anyway. This problem persists because electronic monitoring companies have built a profitable business model around billing the wearer. The companies lobby for expanded use of monitors as 'alternatives to incarceration,' which sounds progressive, but the economic structure is the same: extract fees from people with no bargaining power. Courts adopt monitors because they reduce jail overcrowding on paper, and no judge wants to be seen as soft on crime by removing monitoring conditions. The wearer has no market choice, no ability to negotiate the daily rate, and no recourse when the technology fails.

Evidence

Fines and Fees Justice Center 50-State Survey on E-Monitoring Fees: https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/articles/electronic-monitoring-fees-a-50-state-survey-of-the-costs-assessed-to-people-on-e-supervision/ | Alabama $10/day case: https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/articles/life-on-an-ankle-monitor-in-alabama-10-a-day-and-inevitable-imperfections/ | ProPublica 'Digital Jail' investigation: https://www.propublica.org/article/digital-jail-how-electronic-monitoring-drives-defendants-into-debt | NIJ study on job loss (22%): https://gwtoday.gwu.edu/study-finds-issues-electronic-ankle-monitors-used-alternative-incarceration | ACLU testimony: https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/ankle-monitoring-devices-fail-harm-and-stigmatize

Comments